Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China has ratings and reviews. BlackOxford said: Continuity as IllusionI question whether even the C. Ezra F. Vogel tells the story of how a Communist Party official changed China. A look at the career of Deng Xiaoping, who changed China’s course.
|Published (Last):||25 June 2013|
|PDF File Size:||4.8 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.42 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Tbe for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page.
No one in the twentieth century had a greater impact on world history than Deng Xiaoping. And no scholar is better qualified than Ezra Vogel to disentangle the contradictions embodied in the life and legacy of China’s boldest strategist–the pragmatic, disciplined force behind China’s radical economic, technological, and social transformation.
Hardcoverpages. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Deng Xiaoping and the Vogeo of Chinaplease sign up. Be the first to ask a question about Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China. Lists with This Book. Apr 16, BlackOxford rated it it was amazing Shelves: Continuity as Illusion I question whether even the Chinese understand China.
Perhaps because if they did the result might be mass suicide. Much better to, like the Catholic Church, re-shape the meaning of words to the needs of the day while keeping the form constant.
A sort of rationality can thus be maintained within the most irrational of situations. Deng’s practical repudiation of the Maoism that almost killed him while maintaining the forms of Maoist ‘thought’ is the theme of this breath-takin Continuity as Illusion I question whether even the Chinese understand China.
Deng’s practical repudiation of the Maoism that almost killed him while maintaining the forms of Maoist ‘thought’ is the theme of this breath-taking political biography. Among other reasons for reading it is that none of the Chinese literature of the last 30 years is comprehensible without it. Could it be that the Communist Party of China, indeed the entire Chinese political system, is merely an enormous irony enacted for the edification of unknowledgeable foreigners who believe that there must really be some underlying logic to Chinese society?
Its purpose then would be to keep us busy or entertained by expressions that mean precisely the opposite of their literal translations.
Either that or they really are mad. View all 14 comments. Michael Perkins Michaels in America. Thus, there were always a few of us Michaels in America. Thus, there were always a few of us in every class or other organization named Michael.
Several of us would snap our heads in the same direction when someone said “Michael. Thus, there were al Michael wrote: Thus, there were always a few of us in every class or other organization named M Jan 26, Zach Zhao rated it it was amazing Shelves: No country underwent greater changes in the second half of the twentieth century than China and no man was more responsible for these changes than the subject of this incredible biography.
Deng Xiaoping – the architect of modern China – received both the respect and the criticism that he deserved in Vogel’s well-researched book. The author skillfully tied the ups and downs of Deng’s personal life with those of the country that Deng so deeply loved and by doing so, crafted a piece of work that is No country underwent greater changes in the second half of the twentieth century than China and no man was more responsible for these changes than the subject of this incredible biography.
The author skillfully tied the ups and downs of Deng’s personal life with those of the country that Deng so deeply loved and by doing so, crafted a piece of work that is both academic and accessible, both objective and heartfelt. This is a thorough examination not only on Deng Xiaoping the man, but also on the many turning points in China’s recent history, for which Deng was often responsible the reform and opening policy, the normalization of relationships with the U.
As a person, Deng was warm yet guarded. As a leader, Deng was progressive yet restrained. As a spokesperson for China, Deng was witty yet manipulative. The book portraits Deng as a paramount leader whose virtues and flaws are equally visible and whose influence is unparalleled – a portrait that is most likely not very far away from the truth.
There are nevertheless some minor issues I have with the book. Vogel chose not to follow a strictly chronological order when recounting Deng’s life story, but instead structured the book based on the nature of Deng’s various policies. While this approach certainly helps the readers connect the dots between different periods of Deng’s life, it occasionally becomes confusing especially since so many events and characters are involved.
There were also some translation errors that I have noticed, the most egregious being when Vogel tried to explain the significance of Hua Guofeng’s adopted name.
Be a global citizen.
Vogel claimed that it means “Chinese vanguard against the Japanese”. However, “Hua” means China, “Guo” means nation, “Feng” means vanguard. How Vogel managed to see “Japanese” in these three characters is a mystery beyond my comprehension.
But transfrmation one could look past these minor mistakes, one would certainly have an enjoyable read. Aug 31, Jordan rated it liked it.
It wasn’t a easy read. Not because transgormation writer was not talented. In contrast this book provided a fascinating account of Deng’s life. The event leading up to the tragic Tiananmen square was covered in details. The things I learned about Deng from this book: He doesn’t like to talk, he’s short, he was a oversea student in France, he suffered three purges under Mao, one of his sons was crippled due to Cultural revolution. Deng was a ultimate political survivor. What ultimate helped Deng was Mao beli It wasn’t a easy read.
What ultimate helped Deng was Mao believed Deng was loyal to him because of an episode during the civil war struggle against Nationalist regime. When Deng took over the country was in ruin because of Cultural Revolution.
Deng quickly pushed aside Hua Guofeng and was established as the paramount leader. He wasn’t concern with formal expression of power rather then with informal accumulation of power. Deng never hold high position in the State. His power was derived from being the chairman of Central Military Commission.
Throughout his career, Deng was known as a good diplomat. Nixon had good impression of him. Deng also forged close tie with Bush Sr. Deng negotiated the return of Hong Kong. He was widely popular early in his regime. His pursue of economics reform ultimately to inflation which caused the student uprising. The crushing of student uprising tarnished his reputation. Overall, his economics reform improved quality of life of billion of Chinese but it also led to widespread political corruption that is still plaguing China’s current government.
Oct 21, Hadrian rated it it was amazing Shelves: An enormous, fascinating view of the man who had, after a century and a half of agony, brought China into the modern age, and brought hundreds of millions out of poverty. Deng is not an easy man to write about, due to the nature of his work, his government, and the fact that he didn’t take notes and instead memorized everything.
Many Chinese government archives also remain off-limits. After spending less then a hundred pages on the first fifty years of his life, the next six hundred are devoted t An enormous, fascinating view of the man who had, after a century and a half of agony, brought China into the modern age, and brought hundreds of millions out of poverty.
After spending less then a hundred pages on the first fifty years of his life, the next six hundred are devoted to his rise to power, diplomatic relations, and economic reforms. His leadership and reforms were not wholly certain – he had to outmaneuver the bloodthirsty ‘Gang of Four’, and one of Mao’s chosen successors in order to gain power.
But then, he took a collaborative approach, and refused to recreate a personality cult. Deng did not merely throw open the gates and declare ‘free markets’ as Gorbachev did. Instead, he prepared his power base, experimented on a small scale with cities, worked carefully with foreign governments to create favorable conditions and a well-trained and equipped workforce.
His most famous quote, taken from a country proverb, that the color of the cat doesn’t matter so long as it catches mice, is a signature of his leadership.
Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China — Ezra F. Vogel | Harvard University Press
If it works, let it spread. It is disconcerting to note that Deng was a key figure in some of Mao’s worst excesses. The most unfortunate blot on his memory is the Student Uprisings and Tiananmen. He retired soon after. But he is not unique in that regard. Nearly every Asian country in the 20th century to say nothing of any country has had its own troubles. After all, one can give his policies the credit of saving hundreds of millions of people from poverty.
There is still much to be done, and the continued monolithic power of the CCP is by no means certain – its economic rise is continuing. Deng brought China forward and made it prosperous. It will be seen if someone as visionary as him makes it free.
Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China, by Ezra Vogel, is a fabulously written biography of one of modern China’s most well regarded politicians. Deng Xiaoping was a fascinating character, who put the framework in place that China has used to modernize and bring millions of people out of poverty. He redesigned China’s political landscape, radically altered its Marxist economy and put the necessary reforms in place to put China on the path to its current position in the world.
Even so, his Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China, by Ezra Vogel, is a fabulously written biography of one of modern China’s most well regarded politicians. Even so, his tenure in politics is not without controversy.