AS (Incorporating Amendment No. 1). Termite management. Part 1: New building work. AS This is a free 8 page. Changes to AS relating to termite management for pre-construction from 1 May This article was provided by AEPMA. The AS From the 1st of May the above Standard replaces AS If you are doing Pre-construction work you should get a copy of AS if you .
|Published (Last):||19 April 2007|
|PDF File Size:||19.27 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.2 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Subfloor voids and undercroft areas that in general terms have a working height of mm or more, would be easy to enter to re-apply a protection system; so only if the working height is less than mm will an additional method of installation be required.
Questions have arisen around Section 7 of AS In practical terms, if an area cannot be easily re-treated, it is concealed and inaccessible.
New building work; which is a published document that provides a range of options for termite management that can be implemented during the construction of buildings and needs to be followed.
Assessment criteria for termite management systems This means that as of 1 May you will be required to comply with the new version of AS All members working in termite management at construction should have a copy of this Standard.
Changes to AS relating to termite management for pre-construction from 1 May
Subscribe to our mailing list to get the updates to your email inbox. There has been a transition period from the previous Qs to the New Standards, which will end on 30 April In this instance, further protection would be required. In some parts of Australia, it is common practice not to tie the slab to the footings, therefore an entry point exists in the cavity as the slab is not classed as being monolithic.
AEPMA’s interpretation of Concealed and Inaccessible Areas Concealed and inaccessible areas are any 3660.1 of a structure that are not accessible for visual inspection, or application of a termite management treatment, without the treatment being invasive.
This is now under Section 7 of AS The AS suite of Standards were reviewed and updated in Few members will need a copy of this Standard. AEPMA’s concern is not about broader building practises, and whether a builder will construct the building to the correct Code or Specification, or if a certifier will accept something less than the Australian Standard.
REMINDER: AS 3660.1-2014 Termite Management Part 1: New Building Work
We would like to thank all AEPMA members who participated in the Standards development including making representations. If a concrete slab 36600.1 used as a component of a system, it in itself will not provide a complete termite management system. Representatives of government, industry, professional and consumer organisations constituted the Standards Australia technical committee BD Termites.
Further information and clarification can be obtained from your termite management systems’ manufacturers or product resellers. Please input your email: The Committee will now turn its attention to AS The two documents have been developed for use in the National Construction Code and as a tool to assist builders, designers, regulators, manufacturers, installers, and assessors to provide constructions with managed termite risk across Australia.
Depending on the construction methods and site conditions, additional requirements will be necessary for service penetrations through the concrete slab.
It provides a clear path for compliance with AS Assessment criteria for termite management systems. What does this mean?
It provides a range of options for termite management that can be implemented during the construction of buildings. New Building Work replaces the edition from Each of these are “components” which, when integrated, will form a “full termite management system”.
In relation to pavers on sand, these could be 6360.1 and a treatment applied, however if they are on concrete, they would require a different approach. Changes to AS Both revised documents are part of a series on termite management: Aa your builder is quoting the relevant section of AS